Downloads:

82

Downloads of v 7.0.12.1:

82

Last Update:

24 Jan 2016

Package Maintainer(s):

Software Author(s):

  • .dan.g.

Tags:

todolist xml opensource projectplanning

ToDoList(.dan.g.)

Downloads:

82

Downloads of v 7.0.12.1:

82

Maintainer(s):

Software Author(s):

  • .dan.g.

ToDoList(.dan.g.)

All Checks are Passing

2 Passing Test


Validation Testing Passed


Verification Testing Passed

Details

This package was rejected on 25 Jan 2016. The reviewer ferventcoder has listed the following reason(s):

maharishi (maintainer) on 23 Jan 2016 05:30:56 +00:00:

User 'maharishi' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 23 Jan 2016 06:07:02 +00:00:

todolist.dan.g has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • This package uses a helper function that requires administrative permissions, the tag 'admin' should also be in the nuspec. More...
    • NOTE: This becomes a Requirement starting on 1 February 2016.
  • Comments from template should be cleaned up and removed. More...
  • The iconUrl should be added if there is one. Please correct this in the nuspec, if applicable. More...
  • Release Notes (releaseNotes) are a short description of changes in each version of a package. Please include releasenotes in the nuspec. NOTE: To prevent the need to continually update this field, providing a URL to an external list of Release Notes is perfectly acceptable. More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package id includes dots (.). Usually the package id is separated by '-' instead of dots (except in the case of *.install and *.portable). The reviewer will ensure this is not a new package. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 23 Jan 2016 06:12:14 +00:00:

todolist.dan.g has passed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/86520e24a77ec9debf95 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

maharishi (maintainer) on 23 Jan 2016 16:13:31 +00:00:

I have put the package name as todolist.dan.g because the name todolist is already been used by someone else. Although both these softwares are from the same source and the same author. the other package "todolist" is been pending user action from a very long time and the package administrator has not self-rejected the one.

maharishi (maintainer) on 23 Jan 2016 17:12:39 +00:00:

User 'maharishi' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 23 Jan 2016 17:45:02 +00:00:

todolist.dan.g has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • This package uses a helper function that requires administrative permissions, the tag 'admin' should also be in the nuspec. More...
    • NOTE: This becomes a Requirement starting on 1 February 2016.
  • Comments from template should be cleaned up and removed. More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package id includes dots (.). Usually the package id is separated by '-' instead of dots (except in the case of *.install and *.portable). The reviewer will ensure this is not a new package. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 23 Jan 2016 17:46:53 +00:00:

todolist.dan.g has passed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/fbe5e957207f0eb37e66 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

ferventcoder (reviewer) on 23 Jan 2016 19:05:11 +00:00:

Package source is where this chocolatey package source resides.

Please cleanup the automation scripts (the ps1 files) and remove the readme from the package files.

The name of this package should be different, I'm not sure yet what though. Open to suggestions - we don't approve new packages with a "." in the name unless it is for a .install/.portable or another key indicator about a package.

maharishi (maintainer) on 24 Jan 2016 22:40:05 +00:00:

can we put the name of the package as todolist-dang?

maharishi (maintainer) on 24 Jan 2016 22:49:15 +00:00:

User 'maharishi' (maintainer) submitted package.

maharishi (maintainer) on 24 Jan 2016 22:50:04 +00:00:

can we put the name of the package as todolist-dang?

maharishi (maintainer) on 24 Jan 2016 22:53:32 +00:00:

Also, we can wait for this package to get reject "https://chocolatey.org/packages/todolist/6.8.10.0" which is the same as this package. if the other package doesnt get used can use the id as that package ?

Thanks
Maharishi

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 24 Jan 2016 23:22:07 +00:00:

todolist.dan.g has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package id includes dots (.). Usually the package id is separated by '-' instead of dots (except in the case of *.install and *.portable). The reviewer will ensure this is not a new package. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 24 Jan 2016 23:25:50 +00:00:

todolist.dan.g has passed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/47c7fda102d91e8f7983 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

ferventcoder (reviewer) on 25 Jan 2016 13:53:04 +00:00:

>"can we put the name of the package as todolist-dang?"

Ids are only changeable by a maintainer (like yourself) submitting a new package with the proper name. We typically reject a package with an incorrect naming convention if it is brand new in favor of the fixed up name in what is effectively a different package.

The name would either be "user_maintainer_vendor-software" or just "software". So in this case either "todolist" or "dang-todolist".

It appears that since a package of the name we are looking for was already created, I would suggest working with dtgm on this to get that other package approved.

I'm going to reject this package as is because the name would not be approved.

Status Change - Changed status of package from 'submitted' to 'rejected'.

Description

ToDoList is a rare form of task management tool, one that allows you to repeatedly sub-divide your tasks into more manageable pieces whilst still presenting a clean and intuitive user experience.

ToDoList has been in continuous development for the last 10 years and is an ongoing project.

Your tasklists are stored in XML which provides many opportunities for advanced formatting and printing using stylesheets.

ToDoList's flexible design makes it ideal for both IT related projects as well as more general GTD uses.

tools\chocolateyinstall.ps1
$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop';

$packageName= 'todolist'
$toolsDir   = "$(Split-Path -parent $MyInvocation.MyCommand.Definition)"
$url        = 'http://abstractspoon.pbworks.com/f/todolist_exe.zip'

$packageArgs = @{
  packageName   = $packageName
  unzipLocation = $toolsDir
  fileType      = 'ZIP'
  url           = $url
  

  softwareName  = 'todolist*'
  checksum      = ''
  checksumType  = 'md5'
  checksum64    = ''
  checksumType64= 'md5'
}

Install-ChocolateyZipPackage $packageName $url $toolsDir














tools\chocolateyuninstall.ps1


$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop';

$packageName = 'todolist'
$softwareName = 'todolist*'
$installerType = 'ZIP' 


UnInstall-ChocolateyZipPackage $packageName 'todolist_exe.zip' 

No results available for this package. We are building up results for older packages over time so expect to see results. If this is a new package, it should have results within a day or two.

Version Downloads Last Updated Status

7.0.12.1 (20 Jan 2016)
Fixed loading of Ansi tasklists
7.0.12 (14 Jan 2016)
Fixed bug where pasting a text fragment from Firefox would display the wrong source URL
Fixed List View selection render artifacts in full screen when resizing the title pane
Fixed inability to tab to Status field after making the field 'read-only'
Fixed '--unnamed--' attributes appearing in the CSV Import dialog
Fixed 'Preference > User defined tools' to support relative tool and icon paths
Fixed 'Task Comments Preferred Format' not being used for new tasks
Fixed Tree and List views to hide the attribute pane when no columns are visible
Possibly fixed 'Server is Busy' message from MS Word during Print, Print Preview, HTML Export, Transforming
All tasklists are now saved as Unicode for forwards-compatibility with 7.1


This package has no dependencies.

Discussion for the ToDoList(.dan.g.) Package

Ground Rules:

  • This discussion is only about ToDoList(.dan.g.) and the ToDoList(.dan.g.) package. If you have feedback for Chocolatey, please contact the Google Group.
  • This discussion will carry over multiple versions. If you have a comment about a particular version, please note that in your comments.
  • The maintainers of this Chocolatey Package will be notified about new comments that are posted to this Disqus thread, however, it is NOT a guarantee that you will get a response. If you do not hear back from the maintainers after posting a message below, please follow up by using the link on the left side of this page or follow this link to contact maintainers. If you still hear nothing back, please follow the package triage process.
  • Tell us what you love about the package or ToDoList(.dan.g.), or tell us what needs improvement.
  • Share your experiences with the package, or extra configuration or gotchas that you've found.
  • If you use a url, the comment will be flagged for moderation until you've been whitelisted. Disqus moderated comments are approved on a weekly schedule if not sooner. It could take between 1-5 days for your comment to show up.
comments powered by Disqus