Ansible
PS DSC
Downloads:
2,369
Downloads of v 1.31.2.1:
123
Last Update:
10 May 2020
Package Maintainer(s):
Software Author(s):
- Guillaume FOUET
Tags:
visipics admin pictures double finder- Software Specific:
- Software Site
- Package Specific:
- Package Source
- Package outdated?
- Package broken?
- Contact Maintainers
- Contact Site Admins
- Software Vendor?
- Report Abuse
- Download
visipics (Install)
- Software Specific:
- Software Site
- Package Specific:
- Package Source
- Package outdated?
- Package broken?
- Contact Maintainers
- Contact Site Admins
- Software Vendor?
- Report Abuse
- Download
Downloads:
2,369
Downloads of v 1.31.2.1:
123
Maintainer(s):
Software Author(s):
- Guillaume FOUET
visipics (Install)
- 1
- 2
- 3
Some Checks Have Failed or Are Not Yet Complete
Not All Tests Have Passed
Validation Testing Passed
Verification Testing Passed
DetailsScan Testing Resulted in Flagged:
This package was submitted (and approved) prior to automated virus scanning integration into the package moderation processs.
We recommend clicking the "Details" link to make your own decision on installing this package.
This package was rejected on 29 Jul 2020. The reviewer chocolatey-ops has listed the following reason(s):
VisiPics is a tiny, free application for Windows that will search for duplicate photos. You can search for duplicate images using three different filters: (1) Strict (will return almost identical results - the image is the same or slightly different), (2) Basic and (3) Loose (with much more differences). Additionally, you can also use the "Auto-Select" feature which will mark images with smaller, uncompressed, lower resolution copies as duplicates. The program has other features such as: unignore, unselect (deselect), ignore the folders or files. This software will work with most important formats: JPEG, GIF, PNG, BMP, PCX, TIFF, TGA and RAW images. According to the author, the software has been tested with 100.000 pictures with a size of 15 GB and the results were available in approximately 3 hours. Another advantage is the ability to delete duplicate files while the program is scanning for them - you don't have to wait to finish the scan. Although this program was made exclusively for Windows users, various other reviews claimed that the program runs great on Linux using Wine.
$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop';
$packageName = 'visipics'
$softwareName = 'VisiPics*'
$installerType = 'EXE'
$silentArgs = '/VERYSILENT'
$validExitCodes = @(0, 3010, 1605, 1614, 1641)
$uninstalled = $false
$local_key = 'HKCU:\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\*'
$machine_key = 'HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\*'
$machine_key6432 = 'HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\*'
$key = Get-ItemProperty -Path @($machine_key6432,$machine_key, $local_key) `
-ErrorAction SilentlyContinue `
| ? { $_.DisplayName -like "$softwareName" }
if ($key.Count -eq 1) {
$key | % {
$file = "$($_.UninstallString)"
Uninstall-ChocolateyPackage -PackageName $packageName `
-FileType $installerType `
-SilentArgs "$silentArgs" `
-ValidExitCodes $validExitCodes `
-File "$file"
}
} elseif ($key.Count -eq 0) {
Write-Warning "$packageName has already been uninstalled by other means."
} elseif ($key.Count -gt 1) {
Write-Warning "$key.Count matches found!"
Write-Warning "To prevent accidental data loss, no programs will be uninstalled."
Write-Warning "Please alert package maintainer the following keys were matched:"
$key | % {Write-Warning "- $_.DisplayName"}
}http://www.visipics.info/index.php?title=VisiPics:Privacy_policyAvoid Fosshub by including this file : https://www.fosshub.com/VisiPics.htmlmd5: E181E0FE2C715EC625A2DDEAD3BE2A6A | sha1: 31F4114F14AD47BF83E992BE9496F66671A933A9 | sha256: C8F927015C6FCDBBA3863B4E65C8B4C18670923D85F11E91118BE0AE6CACCE01 | sha512: 595F92FBBBEA853F578389CA089BD7F6AA891A768EF1518C92EA50DB65D2DF15B34493FFD7A3BCC9F3237305EAA6222380490BBF289442A378523595571F7C85Log in or click on link to see number of positives.
- VisiPics-1-31.exe (c8f927015c6f) - ## / 72
- visipics.1.31.2.1.nupkg (a43239d9b480) - ## / 65
In cases where actual malware is found, the packages are subject to removal. Software sometimes has false positives. Moderators do not necessarily validate the safety of the underlying software, only that a package retrieves software from the official distribution point and/or validate embedded software against official distribution point (where distribution rights allow redistribution).
Chocolatey Pro provides runtime protection from possible malware.
This package has no dependencies.
Ground Rules:
- This discussion is only about visipics (Install) and the visipics (Install) package. If you have feedback for Chocolatey, please contact the Google Group.
- This discussion will carry over multiple versions. If you have a comment about a particular version, please note that in your comments.
- The maintainers of this Chocolatey Package will be notified about new comments that are posted to this Disqus thread, however, it is NOT a guarantee that you will get a response. If you do not hear back from the maintainers after posting a message below, please follow up by using the link on the left side of this page or follow this link to contact maintainers. If you still hear nothing back, please follow the package triage process.
- Tell us what you love about the package or visipics (Install), or tell us what needs improvement.
- Share your experiences with the package, or extra configuration or gotchas that you've found.
- If you use a url, the comment will be flagged for moderation until you've been whitelisted. Disqus moderated comments are approved on a weekly schedule if not sooner. It could take between 1-5 days for your comment to show up.
tunisiano (maintainer) on 10 May 2020 08:53:55 +00:00:
User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 10 May 2020 09:27:49 +00:00:
visipics has failed automated validation.
Requirements
Requirements represent the minimum quality of a package that is acceptable. When a package version has failed requirements, the package version requires fixing and/or response by the maintainer. Provided a Requirement has flagged correctly, it must be fixed before the package version can be approved. The exact same version should be uploaded during moderation review.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
Notes
Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 10 May 2020 10:38:07 +00:00:
visipics has passed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/e92bda5cfe7c767352bf9739b3384bd7 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.
tunisiano (maintainer) on 10 May 2020 10:56:28 +00:00:
User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 10 May 2020 11:29:54 +00:00:
visipics has failed automated validation.
Requirements
Requirements represent the minimum quality of a package that is acceptable. When a package version has failed requirements, the package version requires fixing and/or response by the maintainer. Provided a Requirement has flagged correctly, it must be fixed before the package version can be approved. The exact same version should be uploaded during moderation review.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
Notes
Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.
tunisiano (maintainer) on 10 May 2020 11:35:54 +00:00:
User 'tunisiano' (maintainer) submitted package.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 10 May 2020 12:09:58 +00:00:
visipics has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
Notes
Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 10 May 2020 12:15:06 +00:00:
visipics has passed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/931072988abbcc894693161f4a7d3a50 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.
gep13 (reviewer) on 16 May 2020 19:45:24 +00:00:
The contents of the verification.txt and the license.txt don't provide enough information in order for me to know whether the contents of this package "can" be embedded. Can you please provide more information.
tunisiano (maintainer) on 20 May 2020 15:15:47 +00:00:
The Author has changed the rights so now we can't distribute it anymore
gep13 (reviewer) on 23 May 2020 19:40:36 +00:00:
In which case, can you update the package to use a download URL?
tunisiano (maintainer) on 24 May 2020 15:58:39 +00:00:
The new rules is do not distribute, and the only installer is on fosshub, so for this package, i don't think there is a solution...
flcdrg (reviewer) on 24 Jun 2020 09:40:39 +00:00:
I note that this software comes from Fosshub. Given https://github.com/chocolatey/package-validator/wiki/ScriptsDoNotDownloadFromFossHub and https://www.fosshub.com/tos.html, can you show if there's a license that allows the software to be redistributed, or that you have obtained permission from FossHub to redistribute the software?
David
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 14 Jul 2020 09:41:26 +00:00:
We've found visipics v1.31.2.1 in a submitted status and waiting for your next actions. It has had no updates for 20 or more days since a reviewer has asked for corrections. Please note that if there is no response or fix of the package within 15 days of this message, this package version will automatically be closed (rejected) due to being stale.
Take action:
If your package is failing automated testing, you can use the chocolatey test environment to manually run the verification and determine what may need to be fixed.
Note: We don't like to see packages automatically rejected. It doesn't mean that we don't value your contributions, just that we can not continue to hold packages versions in a waiting status that have possibly been abandoned. If you don't believe you will be able to fix up this version of the package within 15 days, we strongly urge you to log in to the site and respond to the review comments until you are able to.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 29 Jul 2020 09:43:17 +00:00:
Unfortunately there has not been progress to move visipics v1.31.2.1 towards an approved status within 15 days after the last review message, so we need to close (reject) the package version at this time. If you want to pick this version up and move it towards approval in the future, use the contact site admins link on the package page and we can move it back into a submitted status so you can submit updates.
Status Change - Changed status of package from 'submitted' to 'rejected'.