Downloads:
1,431
Downloads of v 10.2.300:
1,431
Last Update:
05 Apr 2021
Package Maintainer(s):
Software Author(s):
- SonicWall
Tags:
sw sonicwall netextender client vpn security privacy- Software Specific:
- Software Site
- Package Specific:
- Package outdated?
- Package broken?
- Contact Maintainers
- Contact Site Admins
- Software Vendor?
- Report Abuse
- Download
SonicWall Netextender (Install)
- Software Specific:
- Software Site
- Package Specific:
- Package outdated?
- Package broken?
- Contact Maintainers
- Contact Site Admins
- Software Vendor?
- Report Abuse
- Download
Downloads:
1,431
Downloads of v 10.2.300:
1,431
Maintainer(s):
Software Author(s):
- SonicWall
SonicWall Netextender (Install)
- 1
- 2
- 3
Some Checks Have Failed or Are Not Yet Complete
Not All Tests Have Passed
This package was rejected on 01 Jun 2021. The reviewer chocolatey-ops has listed the following reason(s):
Sonicwall Netextender Client install version 10.2.300 with Certificate. This installation is intended to allow for a computer to connect to a private network through a Sonicwall SMA using the Sonicwall Netextender Client. Once installed, this client will facilitate connectivity with the SMA and allow access based on credential verification and access rights.
if (!(Test-Path Function:\Import-Certificate)) {
function Import-Certificate([string]$FilePath, [string]$CertStoreLocation) {
$certSplits = $CertStoreLocation -replace '^cert\:\\' -split '\\'
if (!($certSplits.Length -eq 2)) { throw "Unexpected certificate storage location" }
$certutil = Get-Command "certutil" | Select-Object -ExpandProperty Path
if (!$certutil) { throw "Path to certutil was not found" }
$arguments = @(
'-addstore'
$certSplits[1]
"$(Resolve-Path $FilePath)"
)
Start-ChocolateyProcessAsAdmin -ExeToRun $certutil -Statements $arguments
}
}
$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop';
$packageArgs = @{
packageName = $env:ChocolateyPackageName
softwareName = 'sonicwallnetextender*'
fileType = 'EXE'
silentArgs = "/qn /norestart"
validExitCodes= @(0, 3010, 1605, 1614, 1641)
}
$uninstalled = $false
[array]$key = Get-UninstallRegistryKey -SoftwareName $packageArgs['softwareName']
if ($key.Count -eq 1) {
$key | % {
$packageArgs['file'] = "$($_.UninstallString)"
if ($packageArgs['fileType'] -eq 'MSI') {
$packageArgs['silentArgs'] = "$($_.PSChildName) $($packageArgs['silentArgs'])"
$packageArgs['file'] = ''
} else {
}
Uninstall-ChocolateyPackage @packageArgs
}
} elseif ($key.Count -eq 0) {
Write-Warning "$packageName has already been uninstalled by other means."
} elseif ($key.Count -gt 1) {
Write-Warning "$($key.Count) matches found!"
Write-Warning "To prevent accidental data loss, no programs will be uninstalled."
Write-Warning "Please alert package maintainer the following keys were matched:"
$key | % {Write-Warning "- $($_.DisplayName)"}
}
Log in or click on link to see number of positives.
- NXSetupU.exe (6a49c36ee23e) - ## / 69
- sonicwallnetextenderInstall.EXE (d5ba2418371a) - ## / 69
- sonicwallnetextender.10.2.300.nupkg (bbe36e26af44) - ## / 61
In cases where actual malware is found, the packages are subject to removal. Software sometimes has false positives. Moderators do not necessarily validate the safety of the underlying software, only that a package retrieves software from the official distribution point and/or validate embedded software against official distribution point (where distribution rights allow redistribution).
Chocolatey Pro provides runtime protection from possible malware.
Copyright © 2020 SonicWall Inc.
This package has no dependencies.
Ground Rules:
- This discussion is only about SonicWall Netextender (Install) and the SonicWall Netextender (Install) package. If you have feedback for Chocolatey, please contact the Google Group.
- This discussion will carry over multiple versions. If you have a comment about a particular version, please note that in your comments.
- The maintainers of this Chocolatey Package will be notified about new comments that are posted to this Disqus thread, however, it is NOT a guarantee that you will get a response. If you do not hear back from the maintainers after posting a message below, please follow up by using the link on the left side of this page or follow this link to contact maintainers. If you still hear nothing back, please follow the package triage process.
- Tell us what you love about the package or SonicWall Netextender (Install), or tell us what needs improvement.
- Share your experiences with the package, or extra configuration or gotchas that you've found.
- If you use a url, the comment will be flagged for moderation until you've been whitelisted. Disqus moderated comments are approved on a weekly schedule if not sooner. It could take between 1-5 days for your comment to show up.
djschumacher (maintainer) on 18 Feb 2021 17:58:18 +00:00:
User 'djschumacher' (maintainer) submitted package.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 18 Feb 2021 18:29:52 +00:00:
sonicwallnetextender has failed automated validation.
Requirements
Requirements represent the minimum quality of a package that is acceptable. When a package version has failed requirements, the package version requires fixing and/or response by the maintainer. Provided a Requirement has flagged correctly, it must be fixed before the package version can be approved. The exact same version should be uploaded during moderation review.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
packageSourceUrl
, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
Notes
Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 18 Feb 2021 20:25:39 +00:00:
sonicwallnetextender has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
packageSourceUrl
, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
Notes
Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.
djschumacher (maintainer) on 18 Feb 2021 21:47:17 +00:00:
I have added tags as requested as well as included the website address in the ProjectURL.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 19 Feb 2021 00:41:22 +00:00:
sonicwallnetextender has failed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/67d6357cc9b9b6ba8277ea75ca908baa for details.
The package status will be changed and will be waiting on your next actions.
djschumacher (maintainer) on 19 Feb 2021 11:30:32 +00:00:
I have added tags as requested as well as included the website address in the ProjectURL.
djschumacher (maintainer) on 24 Feb 2021 18:33:54 +00:00:
User 'djschumacher' (maintainer) submitted package.
djschumacher (maintainer) on 24 Feb 2021 18:37:50 +00:00:
Uploaded revised package to include installation of the SonicWall Netextender Certificate in the Trusted Publisher Certificate repository. This allows for the silent install of the software. Added Checksum information.
NOTICE: This software install requires a "REBOOT" of the host after installation in order to function as it is installing a service.
djschumacher (maintainer) on 24 Feb 2021 18:37:59 +00:00:
Uploaded revised package to include installation of the SonicWall Netextender Certificate in the Trusted Publisher Certificate repository. This allows for the silent install of the software. Added Checksum information.
NOTICE: This software install requires a "REBOOT" of the host after installation in order to function as it is installing a service.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 24 Feb 2021 19:05:03 +00:00:
sonicwallnetextender has failed automated validation.
Requirements
Requirements represent the minimum quality of a package that is acceptable. When a package version has failed requirements, the package version requires fixing and/or response by the maintainer. Provided a Requirement has flagged correctly, it must be fixed before the package version can be approved. The exact same version should be uploaded during moderation review.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
packageSourceUrl
, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
Notes
Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.
djschumacher (maintainer) on 24 Feb 2021 19:56:52 +00:00:
User 'djschumacher' (maintainer) submitted package.
djschumacher (maintainer) on 24 Feb 2021 20:22:05 +00:00:
Repackaged with missing files. Uploaded for review.
djschumacher (maintainer) on 24 Feb 2021 20:25:01 +00:00:
Repackaged with missing files. Uploaded for review.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 24 Feb 2021 20:30:26 +00:00:
sonicwallnetextender has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
packageSourceUrl
, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
Notes
Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.
djschumacher (maintainer) on 24 Feb 2021 21:01:57 +00:00:
Repackaged with missing files. Uploaded for review.
djschumacher (maintainer) on 24 Feb 2021 21:58:42 +00:00:
Repackaged with missing files. Uploaded for review.
djschumacher (maintainer) on 24 Feb 2021 23:18:35 +00:00:
Repackaged with missing files. Uploaded for review.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 24 Feb 2021 23:47:10 +00:00:
sonicwallnetextender has passed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/82a034dc9d2e1e6dc1b78af194a9aab6 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.
djschumacher (maintainer) on 25 Feb 2021 00:31:40 +00:00:
Repackaged with missing files. Uploaded for review.
djschumacher (maintainer) on 25 Feb 2021 00:33:59 +00:00:
Thank you for providing this information and letting me know it has passed the initial testing. I am looking forward to having it listed in order to utilize it!
TheCakeIsNaOH (reviewer) on 26 Feb 2021 02:21:57 +00:00:
Hi, there are some items that should be addressed:
chocolateybeforemodify.ps1
is unused, it should be removed.chocolateyuninstall.ps1
still has default comments included, they should be removed.license.txt
and theVERIFICATION.txt
need to be filled in.Install-ChocolateyInstallPackage
for embedded installers. UsingInstall-ChocolateyPackage
does work, but is not ideal.iconUrl
should be switched from github raw to a CDN: https://docs.chocolatey.org/en-us/create/create-packages#package-icon-guidelinesThanks, TheCakeIsNaOH
djschumacher (maintainer) on 26 Feb 2021 14:26:28 +00:00:
Hello TheCakeIsNaOH!
I have taken the time to review your comments and suggestions. I will make the appropriate modifications based on your review. I would like to point out that I believe you may have reviewed an older upload of this package. I say this as I do not have the icons included currently due to them not functioning correctly AND the current package had the Install-ChocolateyInstallPackage changed to the Install-ChocolateyPackage
I will update the rest of the information and resubmit this morning.
~Schu
TheCakeIsNaOH (reviewer) on 26 Feb 2021 14:45:35 +00:00:
Hmm, every time you re-push, it should overwrite the older one.
When I download this package, I still see the
iconUrl
. Are you sure you re-ranchoco pack
after making your changes and before runningchoco push
?TheCakeIsNaOH
djschumacher (maintainer) on 26 Feb 2021 15:05:13 +00:00:
Hello TheCakeIsNaOH!
I have taken the time to review your comments and suggestions. I will make the appropriate modifications based on your review. I would like to point out that I believe you may have reviewed an older upload of this package. I say this as I do not have the icons included currently due to them not functioning correctly AND the current package had the Install-ChocolateyInstallPackage changed to the Install-ChocolateyPackage
I will update the rest of the information and resubmit this morning.
~Schu
djschumacher (maintainer) on 26 Feb 2021 15:14:15 +00:00:
I just downloaded the package (again) and checked for myself. The contents are as follows and how they are listed on the Chocolatey page:
Files ->
tools\Certhelp.ps1
tools\chocolateybeforemodify.ps1
tools\chocolateyinstall.ps1
tools\chocolateyuninstall.ps1
tools\LICENSE.txt
tools\NXSetupU.exe
tools\SWCERT.cer
tools\VERIFICATION.txt
I am not sure what you have. But it is old data. I am working on revising files based on your reccomendation.
~Schu
TheCakeIsNaOH (reviewer) on 26 Feb 2021 15:27:12 +00:00:
Virus Scanner has ben set to rerun
TheCakeIsNaOH (reviewer) on 26 Feb 2021 15:28:52 +00:00:
Hi,
The
NXSetupU.exe
has a very high virustotal result (18 positives).Do you have any explaination as to why that is?
TheCakeIsNaOH
djschumacher (maintainer) on 26 Feb 2021 16:02:38 +00:00:
Unfortunately, I do not have an explanation. This file is provided by SoncWall. I have no control over its contents or its makeup. It is however, required in order to securely connect to my SonicWall SMA 500v for Azure.
djschumacher (maintainer) on 26 Feb 2021 16:11:03 +00:00:
Unfortunately, I do not have an explanation. This file is provided by SoncWall. I have no control over its contents or its makeup. It is however, required in order to securely connect to my SonicWall SMA 500v for Azure.
djschumacher (maintainer) on 26 Feb 2021 17:05:46 +00:00:
User 'djschumacher' (maintainer) submitted package.
djschumacher (maintainer) on 26 Feb 2021 17:10:58 +00:00:
Hello All!
I have made the requested changes to the SonicWall NetExtender CLient Install package:
The iconUrl should be switched from github raw to a CDN: https://docs.chocolatey.org/en-us/create/create-packages#package-icon-guidelines -> Icon location modified and readded to the Nuspec file with the new location based on suggestion through GitHack by ~Schu
I will be testing the package this afternoon.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 26 Feb 2021 17:39:51 +00:00:
sonicwallnetextender has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
packageSourceUrl
, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
Notes
Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 26 Feb 2021 19:56:19 +00:00:
sonicwallnetextender has passed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/bdfb3ca07022e8053697bb86f3601f3d for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.
TheCakeIsNaOH (reviewer) on 27 Feb 2021 15:34:56 +00:00:
Hi,
The included
LICENSE.txt
does not explicitly allow redistribution of the software, so unfortunatly, I cannot approve this as is.There are three options:
Also, there are some other items to deal with:
Thanks, TheCakeIsNaOH
djschumacher (maintainer) on 27 Feb 2021 18:34:25 +00:00:
I am not clear on your comment concerning the license.txt
Per SonicWall ->
Product Licensing
SonicWall NetExtender is a free client application
I begged them yesterday to give me any documentaion identifying thier licensing model. I was told repeatedly that it is a free software that ANYONE can download and install.
As for the virustotal -> I downloaded this from Sonicwall and have no control over the content of the exe file.
What "Other" Information are you suggesting be filled out? There is alot of information "above"
I do apologize for any issues this package is causing. Unfortunately, I REALLY need this in order to rollout to our environment as we do a computer refresh. The alternative is going to be a terrible mess and excessively time consuming when this method takes less than 2 minutes.
~Schu
TheCakeIsNaOH (reviewer) on 27 Feb 2021 19:34:44 +00:00:
Hi,
> I was told repeatedly that it is a free software that ANYONE can download and install.
Having a public download of a free piece of software is not the same thing as giving permission to re-distribute the software.
At this point I would suggest downloading the
.exe
at runtime instead of embedding it inside the package.> As for the virustotal -> I downloaded this from Sonicwall and have no control over the content of the exe file.
Perhaps this is something you could contact the software vendor about.
> What "Other" Information are you suggesting be filled out? There is alot of information "above"
licenseUrl
,packageSourceUrl
,releaseNotes
,docsUrl
,mailingListUrl
,bugTrackerUrl
, andprojectSourceUrl
All of these go in the
.nuspec
. Not every software has all of these available, e.g. closed source software won't have aprojectSourceUrl
because their source code is not publicly available.> Unfortunately, I REALLY need this in order to rollout to our environment as we do a computer refresh.
For your information, the Chocolatey community repository is not recomended for direct organizational use due to a number of reasons.
See the packages disclaimer: https://docs.chocolatey.org/en-us/community-repository/community-packages-disclaimer
It is strongly recommended that organizations host their own packages: https://docs.chocolatey.org/en-us/features/host-packages
You can use something as simple as a network share, or a removable drive. Or you can use something like Sonatype Nexus or Inedo ProGet, both of which can act as caching proxies to the Chocolatey community repository.
Also, if you really need access to this package, you can install specifying an explict version, like
choco install sonicwallnetextender --version=10.2.300
and choco will find it. However, this is not really ideal as packages are not immutable until they have been approved, so if this package version needs to be changed more, your clients have an old "version" of this version of the package.TheCakeIsNaOH
djschumacher (maintainer) on 05 Mar 2021 22:30:29 +00:00:
User 'djschumacher' (maintainer) submitted package.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 05 Mar 2021 23:03:28 +00:00:
sonicwallnetextender has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
packageSourceUrl
, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
Notes
Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 06 Mar 2021 00:22:57 +00:00:
sonicwallnetextender has passed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/e2d8c1b9c3b9d5c599cd7c1f684ff314 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.
Pauby (reviewer) on 08 Mar 2021 11:37:26 +00:00:
Virus Scanner has ben set to rerun
TheCakeIsNaOH (reviewer) on 12 Mar 2021 03:01:27 +00:00:
Alright,
So it looks like the current d5ba2418371a binary has an ok virustotal count of one now, so that is no longer an issue.
The redistribution rights are still an issue, as even if a program is free for anyone to use, that does not mean that is is ok for people to redistribute it. See Google Chrome for an example of this.
Here are the three options again:
Install-ChocolateyPackage
a URL instead of passing it a file path.Regards, TheCakeIsNaOH
djschumacher (maintainer) on 12 Mar 2021 19:23:26 +00:00:
User 'djschumacher' (maintainer) submitted package.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 12 Mar 2021 19:54:53 +00:00:
sonicwallnetextender has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
packageSourceUrl
, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
Notes
Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 12 Mar 2021 20:07:14 +00:00:
sonicwallnetextender has passed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/709835ca6d6a89a0bf686789cf1a0d5b for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.
TheCakeIsNaOH (reviewer) on 13 Mar 2021 16:09:46 +00:00:
Hi, there are some items that should be addressed:
LICENSE.txt
andVERIFICATION.txt
are unneeded because there are no binaries embedded inside this package, so they should be removed.chocolateyinstall.ps1
, can those be removed please.Thanks, TheCakeIsNaOH
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 02 Apr 2021 16:10:53 +00:00:
We've found sonicwallnetextender v10.2.300 in a submitted status and waiting for your next actions. It has had no updates for 20 or more days since a reviewer has asked for corrections. Please note that if there is no response or fix of the package within 15 days of this message, this package version will automatically be closed (rejected) due to being stale.
Take action:
If your package is failing automated testing, you can use the chocolatey test environment to manually run the verification and determine what may need to be fixed.
Note: We don't like to see packages automatically rejected. It doesn't mean that we don't value your contributions, just that we can not continue to hold packages versions in a waiting status that have possibly been abandoned. If you don't believe you will be able to fix up this version of the package within 15 days, we strongly urge you to log in to the site and respond to the review comments until you are able to.
djschumacher (maintainer) on 05 Apr 2021 15:19:07 +00:00:
User 'djschumacher' (maintainer) submitted package.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 05 Apr 2021 15:55:03 +00:00:
sonicwallnetextender has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.
Guidelines
Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.
packageSourceUrl
, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...Suggestions
Suggestions are either newly introduced items that will later become Guidelines or items that are don't carry enough weight to become a Guideline. Either way they should be considered. A package version can be approved without addressing Suggestion comments.
Notes
Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 05 Apr 2021 16:05:35 +00:00:
sonicwallnetextender has passed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/55e9d71d2fc6221bf338893dfaaac172 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.
flcdrg (reviewer) on 10 Apr 2021 06:04:50 +00:00:
Two things to follow up:
sonicwall-netextender
thanks,
David
gep13 (reviewer) on 27 Apr 2021 10:23:04 +00:00:
Scanner Status Change - Virus Scanner has been set to rerun
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 27 Apr 2021 21:43:29 +00:00:
sonicwallnetextender has failed automated virus scanning.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 17 May 2021 10:25:47 +00:00:
We've found sonicwallnetextender v10.2.300 in a submitted status and waiting for your next actions. It has had no updates for 20 or more days since a reviewer has asked for corrections. Please note that if there is no response or fix of the package within 15 days of this message, this package version will automatically be closed (rejected) due to being stale.
Take action:
If your package is failing automated testing, you can use the chocolatey test environment to manually run the verification and determine what may need to be fixed.
Note: We don't like to see packages automatically rejected. It doesn't mean that we don't value your contributions, just that we can not continue to hold packages versions in a waiting status that have possibly been abandoned. If you don't believe you will be able to fix up this version of the package within 15 days, we strongly urge you to log in to the site and respond to the review comments until you are able to.
chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 01 Jun 2021 10:29:41 +00:00:
Unfortunately there has not been progress to move sonicwallnetextender v10.2.300 towards an approved status within 15 days after the last review message, so we need to close (reject) the package version at this time. If you want to pick this version up and move it towards approval in the future, use the contact site admins link on the package page and we can move it back into a submitted status so you can submit updates.
Status Change - Changed status of package from 'submitted' to 'rejected'.